<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Premio Unicef de fotografía</title>
	<link>http://blogs.eurielec.etsit.upm.es/freedreams/posts/2007/12/18/premio-unicef-de-fotografia/</link>
	<description>Sueños de bisho</description>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 00:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Ueda</title>
		<link>http://blogs.eurielec.etsit.upm.es/freedreams/posts/2007/12/18/premio-unicef-de-fotografia/#comments</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 17:48:19 +0200</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">8547:949@http://blogs.eurielec.etsit.upm.es/freedreams</guid>
					<description>	I’ve turn out to be a devoted aemirdr of the website for some time but not actually supplied just one thing back, I hope to alter that within the future with more conversation.Thanks for another new addition to the internet website.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I’ve turn out to be a devoted aemirdr of the website for some time but not actually supplied just one thing back, I hope to alter that within the future with more conversation.Thanks for another new addition to the internet website.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: car insurance quotes</title>
		<link>http://blogs.eurielec.etsit.upm.es/freedreams/posts/2007/12/18/premio-unicef-de-fotografia/#comments</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 12:50:39 +0200</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">9205:949@http://blogs.eurielec.etsit.upm.es/freedreams</guid>
					<description>	A couple of people have asked me what&amp;#8217;s going on here. The top image is in the Kodak ProPhotoRGB color space, which is so immense that the &amp;#8220;blue&amp;#8221; and &amp;#8220;green&amp;#8221; primaries aren&amp;#8217;t even physically-realizable colors. If your web browser just takes the RGB values in that image and feeds them to your display, the colors will be unrealistically desaturated. The bottom image is in the sRGB color space, which was created to approximate the typical performance of a mid-90s cathode-ray-tube computer display. If your web browser is not color managed and you have a wide-gamut display, the colors will appear oversaturated unless your OS simulates some other display for unmanaged apps. If you have a typical desktop LCD, the colors should appear about right. If you have a laptop, the colors could be nearly right, or desaturated, depending on power and cost tradeoffs made by the people who designed the display subsystem.A final point for those of you who know color management. The color transformation was made in Photoshop, using the ACE color engine (I think ACE stands for Adobe Color Engine, so ACE color engine is redundant, like PIN number or ABS system). The original image was the sRGB image, and ProPhotoRGB can represent any color in that space, so there&amp;#8217;s no gamut mapping going on. The transformation was made using the relative colorimetric rendering intent, so the fact that the white point of sRGB is D65 and that of ProPhotoRGB is D50 has been compensated for, at least within the capabilities of the ACE engine. There are many ways to do white point correction, and none are perfect, but the images appear identical to me in Photoshop and on color-managed browsers.As an aside, if you try this at home and decide that you&amp;#8217;d like to see what the sRGB image looks like in ProPhotoRGB without making the white point correction, you&amp;#8217;d think that you could see that by doing the conversion with the rendering intent set to absolute colorimetric. You&amp;#8217;d be wrong. Adobe has decided that you couldn&amp;#8217;t possibly mean that, and will change the white point anyway. It probably cuts down on support calls, but it seems strange to me.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>A couple of people have asked me what&#8217;s going on here. The top image is in the Kodak ProPhotoRGB color space, which is so immense that the &#8220;blue&#8221; and &#8220;green&#8221; primaries aren&#8217;t even physically-realizable colors. If your web browser just takes the RGB values in that image and feeds them to your display, the colors will be unrealistically desaturated. The bottom image is in the sRGB color space, which was created to approximate the typical performance of a mid-90s cathode-ray-tube computer display. If your web browser is not color managed and you have a wide-gamut display, the colors will appear oversaturated unless your OS simulates some other display for unmanaged apps. If you have a typical desktop LCD, the colors should appear about right. If you have a laptop, the colors could be nearly right, or desaturated, depending on power and cost tradeoffs made by the people who designed the display subsystem.A final point for those of you who know color management. The color transformation was made in Photoshop, using the ACE color engine (I think ACE stands for Adobe Color Engine, so ACE color engine is redundant, like PIN number or ABS system). The original image was the sRGB image, and ProPhotoRGB can represent any color in that space, so there&#8217;s no gamut mapping going on. The transformation was made using the relative colorimetric rendering intent, so the fact that the white point of sRGB is D65 and that of ProPhotoRGB is D50 has been compensated for, at least within the capabilities of the ACE engine. There are many ways to do white point correction, and none are perfect, but the images appear identical to me in Photoshop and on color-managed browsers.As an aside, if you try this at home and decide that you&#8217;d like to see what the sRGB image looks like in ProPhotoRGB without making the white point correction, you&#8217;d think that you could see that by doing the conversion with the rendering intent set to absolute colorimetric. You&#8217;d be wrong. Adobe has decided that you couldn&#8217;t possibly mean that, and will change the white point anyway. It probably cuts down on support calls, but it seems strange to me.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: car insurance quotes</title>
		<link>http://blogs.eurielec.etsit.upm.es/freedreams/posts/2007/12/18/premio-unicef-de-fotografia/#comments</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 08:30:49 +0200</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">9390:949@http://blogs.eurielec.etsit.upm.es/freedreams</guid>
					<description>	I tend not to leave a response, but I browsed some comments on HELP FOR HAITI | Erotic Romance Author Red Garnier talks about romance, life, books, travel. I do have a couple of questions for you if you do not mind. Could it be just me or does it give the impression like some of these responses appear like they are left by brain dead individuals?   And, if you are posting on additional places, I&amp;#8217;d like to keep up with anything fresh you have to post. Could you list of every one of your social community sites like your twitter feed, Facebook page or linkedin profile?|I comment when I like a post on a site or I have something to contribute to the discussion. Usually it&amp;#8217;s a result of the sincerness displayed in the post I browsed. And on this article . I was actually excited enough to post a comment   I actually do have 2 questions for you if you tend not to mind. Is it simply me or does it look like like some of these remarks appear like they are coming from brain dead folks?   And, if you are writing at additional social sites, I&amp;#8217;d like to keep up with anything new you have to post. Could you list all of all your public pages like your Facebook page, twitter feed, or linkedin profile?|I rarely drop remarks, but i did some searching and wound up here HELP FOR HAITI | Erotic Romance Author Red Garnier talks about romance, life, books, travel. And I actually do have 2 questions for you if you don&amp;#8217;t mind. Could it be simply me or does it look as if like some of these remarks come across like they are coming from brain dead people?   And, if you are writing on additional social sites, I&amp;#8217;d like to follow everything fresh you have to post. Could you list of the complete urls of your shared pages like your twitter feed, Facebook page or linkedin profile?|I think that what you posted made a lot of sense. However, what about this? what if you wrote a catchier post title? I am not suggesting your content is not solid, however suppose you added a post title to possibly get folk&amp;#8217;s attention? I mean HELP FOR HAITI | Erotic Romance Author Red Garnier talks about romance, life, books, travel is a little plain. You ought to look at Yahoo&amp;#8217;s home page and note how they create article titles to get viewers interested. You might add a video or a picture or two to get readers excited about what you&amp;#8217;ve written. In my opinion, it might make your posts a little livelier.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I tend not to leave a response, but I browsed some comments on HELP FOR HAITI | Erotic Romance Author Red Garnier talks about romance, life, books, travel. I do have a couple of questions for you if you do not mind. Could it be just me or does it give the impression like some of these responses appear like they are left by brain dead individuals?   And, if you are posting on additional places, I&#8217;d like to keep up with anything fresh you have to post. Could you list of every one of your social community sites like your twitter feed, Facebook page or linkedin profile?|I comment when I like a post on a site or I have something to contribute to the discussion. Usually it&#8217;s a result of the sincerness displayed in the post I browsed. And on this article . I was actually excited enough to post a comment   I actually do have 2 questions for you if you tend not to mind. Is it simply me or does it look like like some of these remarks appear like they are coming from brain dead folks?   And, if you are writing at additional social sites, I&#8217;d like to keep up with anything new you have to post. Could you list all of all your public pages like your Facebook page, twitter feed, or linkedin profile?|I rarely drop remarks, but i did some searching and wound up here HELP FOR HAITI | Erotic Romance Author Red Garnier talks about romance, life, books, travel. And I actually do have 2 questions for you if you don&#8217;t mind. Could it be simply me or does it look as if like some of these remarks come across like they are coming from brain dead people?   And, if you are writing on additional social sites, I&#8217;d like to follow everything fresh you have to post. Could you list of the complete urls of your shared pages like your twitter feed, Facebook page or linkedin profile?|I think that what you posted made a lot of sense. However, what about this? what if you wrote a catchier post title? I am not suggesting your content is not solid, however suppose you added a post title to possibly get folk&#8217;s attention? I mean HELP FOR HAITI | Erotic Romance Author Red Garnier talks about romance, life, books, travel is a little plain. You ought to look at Yahoo&#8217;s home page and note how they create article titles to get viewers interested. You might add a video or a picture or two to get readers excited about what you&#8217;ve written. In my opinion, it might make your posts a little livelier.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
